Hi👋SpeedAlgo • Deliberate Practice & Cognitive Ergonomics for Software Engineers

An interactive algorithm mastery and technical interview preparation platform published by Hi👋WebEnterprise. Built for senior and staff software engineers preparing for rigorous coding screens at top tech companies (FAANG/MAMAA).

13 Core Algorithmic Patterns & 225 Practice Problems

  • 1. Two Pointers (16 Paradigms, 43 Problems): Opposite ends, sorted pair sums, palindrome verification, trapping rain water, 3Sum, container with most water — includes the Sliding Window and Fast & Slow Pointers paradigms (contiguous subarray invariants, longest substrings, Floyd's cycle detection, linked list middle).
  • 2. Binary Search (9 Paradigms, 14 Problems): Monotonic predicate partitioning (feasible(x)), boundary search, rotated sorted arrays, square roots, minimum ship capacity, median of two sorted arrays, matrix median on value range.
  • 3. Bit Manipulation (5 Paradigms, 11 Problems): Counting set bits, XOR cancellation, bit reversal, bitmask pairing, maximum XOR with a bitwise trie.
  • 4. Math & Geometry (8 Paradigms, 14 Problems): Sieve of Eratosthenes, integer/roman conversions, modular arithmetic, geometric simulation.
  • 5. Tree/Graph Depth-First Search (15 Paradigms, 24 Problems): Path sums, lowest common ancestor, tree diameter, validating BSTs, tree DP (House Robber III, Binary Tree Cameras).
  • 6. Tree/Graph Breadth-First Search (5 Paradigms, 12 Problems): Level-order traversals, shortest path in unweighted graphs, zig-zag traversals, rotting oranges, word ladders.
  • 7. Graphs (12 Paradigms, 22 Problems): Topological sort, cycle detection, Dijkstra's algorithm, bipartite graph validation, network delay.
  • 8. Backtracking (6 Paradigms, 14 Problems): Subsets, permutations, combinations, constraint satisfaction, pruning, N-Queens, Sudoku solver.
  • 9. Dynamic Programming (13 Paradigms, 28 Problems): Memoization vs tabulation, 0/1 knapsack, unbounded knapsack, coin change, edit distance, longest common subsequence.
  • 10. Heap / Priority Queue (9 Paradigms, 11 Problems): Running medians, top-k elements, interval scheduling, IPO, k-way merges.
  • 11. Advanced Data Structures (7 Paradigms, 17 Problems): Trie (prefix tree), Union-Find (Disjoint Set Union), LRU Cache, LFU Cache, range-sum queries with updates.
  • 12. Stack (5 Paradigms, 9 Problems): Next greater element, largest rectangle in histogram, remove k digits, decode string, min stack.
  • 13. Intervals & Greedy (2 Paradigms, 6 Problems): Merge intervals, interval scheduling, meeting rooms by sweep line, jump game.

4-Stage Deliberate Practice Framework

  1. Stage 1 (Compare & Learn): Read the pattern's mental model, loop invariant and Big-O proof, compare the pattern's template with the problem's solution side by side, and use the step-by-step debugger. The solution can also be shown in C#, Java, TypeScript, C++, Go or Rust for almost every problem.
  2. Stage 2 (Active Recall): Rebuild the solution from memory in a code editor, with an invariant checklist and optional progressive hints, and check it against a judged test suite.
  3. Stage 3 (AI Interview Coach, coming soon): A mock-interview stage still in development; for now, students go straight from Stage 2 to Stage 4.
  4. Stage 4 (Solve on Your Own): Solve a new problem on your own against a 15-minute timer; your code is graded against a test suite. Python and TypeScript run in your browser and C# runs on our server (design problems grade in Python and TypeScript).

Equipped with a spaced-repetition review hub on a fixed 7-step schedule (1 day up to 90 days), a two-pane Studio workspace, and study notes.

Pricing, Access & Commercial Terms

  • Core Curriculum: 100% Free. No credit card required.
  • Coins: New accounts get 40 free coins once, the daily claim adds +20 coins once a day, and inviting a friend earns you +25 coins when they complete their first practice step. These are the only ways to earn coins.
  • AI Coach: Each AI coach question costs 1-5 coins, priced by the server according to its size.
  • BYOK (Bring Your Own Key): AI coaching is free with your own Google Gemini, OpenAI or OpenRouter API key (BYOK).
  • Extras: Coins also unlock extras for 24 hours: a Recall hint level (1 coin), a Solve solution reveal (2), a LeetCode problem card's solutions (1) and a pattern's extra canonical problems (1).
  • Payments & Refunds: Nothing on the site is sold for money: coins can only be earned, never bought. There are no subscriptions or charges, so there is nothing to refund.
  • Platform Operator: Hi👋WebEnterprise. Support & policies at hispeedalgo.com.
Skip to main content
Hi👋SpeedAlgo

Invariant-First Algorithmic Mastery

Arena
238Items
Theory Context•Depth-First Search (DFS)
EasyLC 257

Binary Tree Paths (LeetCode 257)

Target Frequency:GoogleMetaAmazonApple

You're handed a binary tree's root and asked to trace out every route from that root down to a leaf — a node with no children of its own. Report each route as a single string, its node values strung together with "->", and return the full collection in whatever order is convenient.

Worked Examples

Example 1
Input:root = [1,2,3,null,5]
Output:["1->2->5","1->3"]
2513
Explanation: The tree has two leaves, 5 and 3, so there are two root-to-leaf paths.
Example 2
Input:root = [1]
Output:["1"]
1
Explanation: The root is also a leaf, so the only path is the root by itself.

⚖️Formal Constraints & Bounds

  • The number of nodes in the tree is in the range [1, 100].

  • -100 <= Node.val <= 100

Deep-Dive & Conceptual Insights

Core Insight

Carry one mutable path buffer through the DFS. Append the node when a frame starts, record "->".join(path) only at a node with no children, recurse into both children, then pop before returning so the buffer is exactly as the caller left it.

Real-World Scenario & Production Applications

Listing every route through a decision tree, exporting every full category path in a product taxonomy, enumerating file paths from a directory root to each file.

Subproblems & Recurrence Decomposition3 Phases

🧩Subproblem 1: Choose — Extend the Shared Path

Every real node appends its value to the one shared path buffer as its frame starts.

Mathematical Recurrence / Code Invariant
if not node:
    return
path.append(str(node.val))
Code Shape
Archetype Code Shape
Python
1if not node:
2 return
3path.append(str(node.val))
4if not node.left and not node.right:
5 paths.append("->".join(path))
6dfs(node.left)
7dfs(node.right)
8path.pop()

Conceptual Narrative

🧠 Pattern Intuition & Real-World Analogy

Path Sum II records a path only when its sum hits a target. Binary Tree Paths removes the filter: every root-to-leaf walk is an answer. That makes it the cleanest possible look at the choose-explore-unchoose rhythm, with nothing else in the way.

🧵 The Analogy: A Museum Guide With One Tour Ticket

A guide walks visitors through a museum whose hallways branch like a tree. They carry a single ticket and stamp each room's name on it as they enter. Whenever they reach a dead-end room, they photocopy the ticket and file the copy: that copy is one complete tour. Then, walking back out of each room, they erase its stamp so the ticket is clean for the next hallway. One ticket serves every tour because every stamp is erased exactly when its room is left behind.

🔑 The Key Idea in the Code

"->".join(path) builds a brand-new string, so the recorded answer is a snapshot that later pop() calls can never change. The single shared buffer stays correct only because the append and the pop sit at the very start and the very end of the same frame.

  • Forgetting to unchoose: Forgetting path.pop() leaks one branch's nodes into its sibling's paths ([1,2,3] wrongly yields "1->2->3").

  • Recording at a half-leaf: Recording at any node with a missing child instead of only at true leaves adds half-finished paths ([1,2] wrongly yields "1" as well).

  • Negative values: Negative values need no special handling as long as each value is converted with str() before joining.

Senior SWE Reasoning Architecture

4-Phase Thought Process Model

Pattern Recognition Signals

The 10-second spot

All root-to-leaf paths, returned as strings in any order.

Formulating the Predicate & Invariants

Turning intuition into a boolean rule

Invariant: when a frame starts, path holds the root-to-parent values; when it returns, path is restored to that state.

Silent Failure Traps & Edge Cases

Where confident candidates still lose points

  • Storing the list itself instead of a snapshot: later pops would change the recorded answer; "->".join(path) makes a new string.

The 60-Second Interview Pitch

Say this out loud before you type a single line

I keep one list path and a results list. In dfs(node) I return on None, append str(node.val), and if the node has no children I record "->".join(path). Then I recurse left and right and pop before returning, so every frame undoes its own append. It visits each node once; copying paths at the leaves makes it O(N·H) time, with O(H) extra space for the stack and buffer.

Big-O Invariant Derivation

Complexity & Mathematical Proof

TIME COMPLEXITY

O(N · H)

Look at dfs(node): every node does O(1) work to append and pop its value. At each leaf, "->".join(path) copies a path of length at most H. With L leaves that adds L · O(H), and L ≤ N, so the total is O(N + L · H) ≤ O(N · H).

SPACE COMPLEXITY

O(H) Auxiliary

The recursion stack and the shared path list both hold at most H entries (one per level of the current path). The returned paths list is output, not auxiliary space.

Formal Recurrence Relation

T(N, H) = O(N) + L · O(H) ≤ O(N · H)

Derivation Progression

DFS Traversal

O(N) node visits

Each node appends and pops its value once, O(1) each.

Leaf Snapshots

L leaves × O(H) join

Each finished root-to-leaf path is joined into a new string of length up to H.

Total Time

O(N + L · H) ≤ O(N · H)

A balanced tree has about N/2 leaves of length log N: O(N log N).

Variable Definitions

NNN

Total number of nodes in the binary tree

HHH

Tree height (log N in a balanced tree, N in a skewed tree)

LLL

Number of leaves, one output path each (L ≤ N)

Memory Architecture & Bounds

🟣 Call Stack

O(H) recursion frames

🔵 Auxiliary Heap

O(H) shared path buffer

🟢 Output Space

O(L · H) returned path strings

Boundary Best / Worst Cases

Best Case

O(N)O(N)O(N) on a skewed chain (one leaf).

Average Case

O(Nlog⁡N)O(N \log N)O(NlogN) on a balanced tree.

Worst Case

O(N⋅H)O(N \cdot H)O(N⋅H) when many leaves sit at depth close to HHH.

Graph & Tree Traversal Frontier

Graph & Tree Traversal Frontier
Synthesizing vector architecture diagram...
Staff+ Engineering Perspective

Senior SWE Deconstruction & Hardware Caveats

ARCHITECTURAL SIGNALS & INTERVIEW TRIGGERS

Triggers: "all root-to-leaf paths", "return the paths in any order". Tree Backtracking (Choose-Explore-Unchoose): one shared path buffer walks the whole tree, and a copy of it is recorded every time the walk stands on a leaf.

CONSTRAINTS & BOUNDS

N≤100N \le 100N≤100. Time O(N⋅H)O(N \cdot H)O(N⋅H): every node is visited once, and each of the at most NNN leaves copies a path of length up to HHH.

Theory Context•Depth-First Search (DFS)
EasyLC 257

Binary Tree Paths (LeetCode 257)

Target Frequency:GoogleMetaAmazonApple

You're handed a binary tree's root and asked to trace out every route from that root down to a leaf — a node with no children of its own. Report each route as a single string, its node values strung together with "->", and return the full collection in whatever order is convenient.

Worked Examples

Example 1
Input:root = [1,2,3,null,5]
Output:["1->2->5","1->3"]
2513
Explanation: The tree has two leaves, 5 and 3, so there are two root-to-leaf paths.
Example 2
Input:root = [1]
Output:["1"]
1
Explanation: The root is also a leaf, so the only path is the root by itself.

⚖️Formal Constraints & Bounds

  • The number of nodes in the tree is in the range [1, 100].

  • -100 <= Node.val <= 100

Deep-Dive & Conceptual Insights

Core Insight

Carry one mutable path buffer through the DFS. Append the node when a frame starts, record "->".join(path) only at a node with no children, recurse into both children, then pop before returning so the buffer is exactly as the caller left it.

Real-World Scenario & Production Applications

Listing every route through a decision tree, exporting every full category path in a product taxonomy, enumerating file paths from a directory root to each file.

Subproblems & Recurrence Decomposition3 Phases

🧩Subproblem 1: Choose — Extend the Shared Path

Every real node appends its value to the one shared path buffer as its frame starts.

Mathematical Recurrence / Code Invariant
if not node:
    return
path.append(str(node.val))
Code Shape
Archetype Code Shape
Python
1if not node:
2 return
3path.append(str(node.val))
4if not node.left and not node.right:
5 paths.append("->".join(path))
6dfs(node.left)
7dfs(node.right)
8path.pop()

Conceptual Narrative

🧠 Pattern Intuition & Real-World Analogy

Path Sum II records a path only when its sum hits a target. Binary Tree Paths removes the filter: every root-to-leaf walk is an answer. That makes it the cleanest possible look at the choose-explore-unchoose rhythm, with nothing else in the way.

🧵 The Analogy: A Museum Guide With One Tour Ticket

A guide walks visitors through a museum whose hallways branch like a tree. They carry a single ticket and stamp each room's name on it as they enter. Whenever they reach a dead-end room, they photocopy the ticket and file the copy: that copy is one complete tour. Then, walking back out of each room, they erase its stamp so the ticket is clean for the next hallway. One ticket serves every tour because every stamp is erased exactly when its room is left behind.

🔑 The Key Idea in the Code

"->".join(path) builds a brand-new string, so the recorded answer is a snapshot that later pop() calls can never change. The single shared buffer stays correct only because the append and the pop sit at the very start and the very end of the same frame.

  • Forgetting to unchoose: Forgetting path.pop() leaks one branch's nodes into its sibling's paths ([1,2,3] wrongly yields "1->2->3").

  • Recording at a half-leaf: Recording at any node with a missing child instead of only at true leaves adds half-finished paths ([1,2] wrongly yields "1" as well).

  • Negative values: Negative values need no special handling as long as each value is converted with str() before joining.

Senior SWE Reasoning Architecture

4-Phase Thought Process Model

Pattern Recognition Signals

The 10-second spot

All root-to-leaf paths, returned as strings in any order.

Formulating the Predicate & Invariants

Turning intuition into a boolean rule

Invariant: when a frame starts, path holds the root-to-parent values; when it returns, path is restored to that state.

Silent Failure Traps & Edge Cases

Where confident candidates still lose points

  • Storing the list itself instead of a snapshot: later pops would change the recorded answer; "->".join(path) makes a new string.

The 60-Second Interview Pitch

Say this out loud before you type a single line

I keep one list path and a results list. In dfs(node) I return on None, append str(node.val), and if the node has no children I record "->".join(path). Then I recurse left and right and pop before returning, so every frame undoes its own append. It visits each node once; copying paths at the leaves makes it O(N·H) time, with O(H) extra space for the stack and buffer.

Big-O Invariant Derivation

Complexity & Mathematical Proof

TIME COMPLEXITY

O(N · H)

Look at dfs(node): every node does O(1) work to append and pop its value. At each leaf, "->".join(path) copies a path of length at most H. With L leaves that adds L · O(H), and L ≤ N, so the total is O(N + L · H) ≤ O(N · H).

SPACE COMPLEXITY

O(H) Auxiliary

The recursion stack and the shared path list both hold at most H entries (one per level of the current path). The returned paths list is output, not auxiliary space.

Formal Recurrence Relation

T(N, H) = O(N) + L · O(H) ≤ O(N · H)

Derivation Progression

DFS Traversal

O(N) node visits

Each node appends and pops its value once, O(1) each.

Leaf Snapshots

L leaves × O(H) join

Each finished root-to-leaf path is joined into a new string of length up to H.

Total Time

O(N + L · H) ≤ O(N · H)

A balanced tree has about N/2 leaves of length log N: O(N log N).

Variable Definitions

NNN

Total number of nodes in the binary tree

HHH

Tree height (log N in a balanced tree, N in a skewed tree)

LLL

Number of leaves, one output path each (L ≤ N)

Memory Architecture & Bounds

🟣 Call Stack

O(H) recursion frames

🔵 Auxiliary Heap

O(H) shared path buffer

🟢 Output Space

O(L · H) returned path strings

Boundary Best / Worst Cases

Best Case

O(N)O(N)O(N) on a skewed chain (one leaf).

Average Case

O(Nlog⁡N)O(N \log N)O(NlogN) on a balanced tree.

Worst Case

O(N⋅H)O(N \cdot H)O(N⋅H) when many leaves sit at depth close to HHH.

Graph & Tree Traversal Frontier

Graph & Tree Traversal Frontier
Synthesizing vector architecture diagram...
Staff+ Engineering Perspective

Senior SWE Deconstruction & Hardware Caveats

ARCHITECTURAL SIGNALS & INTERVIEW TRIGGERS

Triggers: "all root-to-leaf paths", "return the paths in any order". Tree Backtracking (Choose-Explore-Unchoose): one shared path buffer walks the whole tree, and a copy of it is recorded every time the walk stands on a leaf.

CONSTRAINTS & BOUNDS

N≤100N \le 100N≤100. Time O(N⋅H)O(N \cdot H)O(N⋅H): every node is visited once, and each of the at most NNN leaves copies a path of length up to HHH.

© 2026 Hi👋WebEnterprise. All rights reserved.
Sitemap•llms.txt•