Hi👋SpeedAlgo • Deliberate Practice & Cognitive Ergonomics for Software Engineers

An interactive algorithm mastery and technical interview preparation platform published by Hi👋WebEnterprise. Built for senior and staff software engineers preparing for rigorous coding screens at top tech companies (FAANG/MAMAA).

13 Core Algorithmic Patterns & 225 Practice Problems

  • 1. Two Pointers (16 Paradigms, 43 Problems): Opposite ends, sorted pair sums, palindrome verification, trapping rain water, 3Sum, container with most water — includes the Sliding Window and Fast & Slow Pointers paradigms (contiguous subarray invariants, longest substrings, Floyd's cycle detection, linked list middle).
  • 2. Binary Search (9 Paradigms, 14 Problems): Monotonic predicate partitioning (feasible(x)), boundary search, rotated sorted arrays, square roots, minimum ship capacity, median of two sorted arrays, matrix median on value range.
  • 3. Bit Manipulation (5 Paradigms, 11 Problems): Counting set bits, XOR cancellation, bit reversal, bitmask pairing, maximum XOR with a bitwise trie.
  • 4. Math & Geometry (8 Paradigms, 14 Problems): Sieve of Eratosthenes, integer/roman conversions, modular arithmetic, geometric simulation.
  • 5. Tree/Graph Depth-First Search (15 Paradigms, 24 Problems): Path sums, lowest common ancestor, tree diameter, validating BSTs, tree DP (House Robber III, Binary Tree Cameras).
  • 6. Tree/Graph Breadth-First Search (5 Paradigms, 12 Problems): Level-order traversals, shortest path in unweighted graphs, zig-zag traversals, rotting oranges, word ladders.
  • 7. Graphs (12 Paradigms, 22 Problems): Topological sort, cycle detection, Dijkstra's algorithm, bipartite graph validation, network delay.
  • 8. Backtracking (6 Paradigms, 14 Problems): Subsets, permutations, combinations, constraint satisfaction, pruning, N-Queens, Sudoku solver.
  • 9. Dynamic Programming (13 Paradigms, 28 Problems): Memoization vs tabulation, 0/1 knapsack, unbounded knapsack, coin change, edit distance, longest common subsequence.
  • 10. Heap / Priority Queue (9 Paradigms, 11 Problems): Running medians, top-k elements, interval scheduling, IPO, k-way merges.
  • 11. Advanced Data Structures (7 Paradigms, 17 Problems): Trie (prefix tree), Union-Find (Disjoint Set Union), LRU Cache, LFU Cache, range-sum queries with updates.
  • 12. Stack (5 Paradigms, 9 Problems): Next greater element, largest rectangle in histogram, remove k digits, decode string, min stack.
  • 13. Intervals & Greedy (2 Paradigms, 6 Problems): Merge intervals, interval scheduling, meeting rooms by sweep line, jump game.

4-Stage Deliberate Practice Framework

  1. Stage 1 (Compare & Learn): Read the pattern's mental model, loop invariant and Big-O proof, compare the pattern's template with the problem's solution side by side, and use the step-by-step debugger. The solution can also be shown in C#, Java, TypeScript, C++, Go or Rust for almost every problem.
  2. Stage 2 (Active Recall): Rebuild the solution from memory in a code editor, with an invariant checklist and optional progressive hints, and check it against a judged test suite.
  3. Stage 3 (AI Interview Coach, coming soon): A mock-interview stage still in development; for now, students go straight from Stage 2 to Stage 4.
  4. Stage 4 (Solve on Your Own): Solve a new problem on your own against a 15-minute timer; your code is graded against a test suite. Python and TypeScript run in your browser and C# runs on our server (design problems grade in Python and TypeScript).

Equipped with a spaced-repetition review hub on a fixed 7-step schedule (1 day up to 90 days), a two-pane Studio workspace, and study notes.

Pricing, Access & Commercial Terms

  • Core Curriculum: 100% Free. No credit card required.
  • Coins: New accounts get 40 free coins once, the daily claim adds +20 coins once a day, and inviting a friend earns you +25 coins when they complete their first practice step. These are the only ways to earn coins.
  • AI Coach: Each AI coach question costs 1-5 coins, priced by the server according to its size.
  • BYOK (Bring Your Own Key): AI coaching is free with your own Google Gemini, OpenAI or OpenRouter API key (BYOK).
  • Extras: Coins also unlock extras for 24 hours: a Recall hint level (1 coin), a Solve solution reveal (2), a LeetCode problem card's solutions (1) and a pattern's extra canonical problems (1).
  • Payments & Refunds: Nothing on the site is sold for money: coins can only be earned, never bought. There are no subscriptions or charges, so there is nothing to refund.
  • Platform Operator: Hi👋WebEnterprise. Support & policies at hispeedalgo.com.
Skip to main content
Hi👋SpeedAlgo

Invariant-First Algorithmic Mastery

Arena
238Items
Theory Context•Binary Search Boundary
MediumLC 1011

Capacity To Ship Packages Within D Days (LC 1011)

Target Frequency:GoogleAmazonMeta

A conveyor belt lines up packages that must all ship out within days days. The i-th package weighs weights[i]; each day you load the ship with the next packages in belt order, but the total you load in a single day can never exceed the ship's weight capacity.

Find the smallest ship capacity that still gets every package shipped within days days.

Worked Examples

Example 1
Input:weights = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], days = 5
Output:15
Explanation: With capacity 15, the days can be 1+2+3+4+5 = 15, 6+7 = 13, 8, 9, 10: exactly 5 days. With capacity 14, the same rule needs 6 days, so 15 is the smallest capacity that works.
Example 2
Input:weights = [3,2,2,4,1,4], days = 3
Output:6
Explanation: Capacity 6 lets the belt ship in exactly 3 days: day 1 carries 3+2=5, day 2 carries 2+4=6, day 3 carries 1+4=5 -- each day stays within capacity 6.
Example 3
Input:weights = [1,2,3,1,1], days = 4
Output:3
Explanation: 1st day: 1 2nd day: 2 3rd day: 3 4th day: 1, 1

⚖️Formal Constraints & Bounds

  • 1 <= days <= weights.length <= 5 * 104

  • 1 <= weights[i] <= 500

Deep-Dive & Conceptual Insights

Core Insight

The answer is a number you choose, not an index. The check can_ship simulates the task for one capacity, and more capacity never needs more days, so the answers are False and then True and Lower Bound finds the first True.

Real-World Scenario & Production Applications

Autoscaling container clusters and shipping logistics: determining the minimum server capacity or cargo fleet size to handle traffic spikes within guaranteed SLA deadlines.

Subproblems & Recurrence Decomposition3 Phases

🧩Subproblem 1: The Check Is A Simulation

Write the check can_ship(capacity) first. One pass packs the packages in order: a package that is heavier than the ship makes the check False, a package that would overflow the day starts a new day, and the check returns days_needed <= days.

Mathematical Recurrence / Code Invariant
def can_ship(capacity):
    days_needed, load = 1, 0
    for w in weights:
        if w > capacity:
            return False
        if load + w > capacity:
            days_needed += 1
            load = 0
        load += w
    return days_needed <= days

Step-by-Step Execution Trace Table

StepRange [lo, hi)mid (capacity)The check can_ship(mid)DecisionNew range [lo, hi)
1[1, 9)5Day 1: 1 + 2 = 3. Package 3 would make 6, so day 2 starts: 3 + 1 + 1 = 5. Days needed: 2, and 2 <= 4 → Truemid may be the smallest: hi = mid[1, 5)
2[1, 5)3Day 1: 1 + 2 = 3. Package 3 would make 6, so day 2: 3. Package 1 would make 4, so day 3: 1 + 1 = 2. Days needed: 3, and 3 <= 4 → Truehi = mid[1, 3)
3[1, 3)2The package of weight 3 is larger than 2, so the guard w > capacity returns → Falseevery capacity up to 2 is too small: lo = mid + 1[3, 3)
4[3, 3)The range is empty. Lower Bound returns 3.

The trace for weights = [1, 2, 3, 1, 1] and days = 4, step by step:

  • The total weight is 8, so the candidates are the capacities 1 to 8. The range is [1, 9).
  • Step 1 tests capacity 5. The packages ship in 2 days, which is at most 4, so 5 works and we keep it with hi = mid.
  • Step 2 tests capacity 3. The packages ship in 3 days, so 3 works too, and we keep it.
  • Step 3 tests capacity 2. The package of weight 3 does not fit on a ship with capacity 2, so the check is False. Capacities 1 and 2 are too small, so lo = mid + 1 = 3.
  • Step 4: lo is equal to hi, so the answer is 3.
Code Shape
Archetype Code Shape
Python
1def can_ship(capacity: int) -> bool:
2 days_needed, load = 1, 0
3 for w in weights:
4 if w > capacity:
5 return False
6 if load + w > capacity:
7 days_needed += 1
8 load = 0
9 load += w
10 return days_needed <= days
11lo = 1
12hi = sum(weights) + 1
13return binary_search_lower_bound(lo, hi, can_ship)

Conceptual Narrative

🧭 Conceptual Foundation & Pattern Intuition

Some answers are not in the input. They are a number you choose: a capacity, a speed, a number of days. The only way to test a number is to run the task with it. So the check is a simulation, and Lower Bound searches the numbers themselves. For Capacity To Ship Packages Within D Days (LC 1011), the check asks: can the packages ship within days days with this capacity?

🚢 The Analogy: Choosing The Size Of A Ship

Imagine you must pick the smallest ship that carries all packages, in belt order, within a deadline. You cannot read the answer from a list. You can only try a ship size and count the days. If a ship of size 15 is enough, a ship of size 16 is enough too. So the sizes that fail come first, and the sizes that work come after them. The smallest size that works is the boundary.

🔑 Why It Works

The simulation answers the question exactly for one capacity. More capacity never needs more days, so the row of answers is False and then True, and Lower Bound finds the first True. The total weight always works, so it is a safe end of the range. The guard w > capacity matters: without it, a ship smaller than one package is reported as working.

  • Lower bound set below maximum single item: Setting lo = 0 or lo = 1 allows candidate capacities smaller than the heaviest package, which can never be shipped. Lower bound must strictly be max(weights).

  • Upper bound set too low: The worst-case upper bound is when all packages are shipped on a single day. hi must be initialized to sum(weights).

  • Off-by-one day counter in greedy feasibility check: Initializing days_needed = 0 instead of 1 underestimates the day count by 1. A new non-empty allocation always requires at least day 1.

Senior SWE Reasoning Architecture

4-Phase Thought Process Model

Pattern Recognition Signals

The 10-second spot

"Find the smallest ship capacity that still gets every package shipped within days days": the smallest value that passes a check, and a bigger capacity never needs more days, so binary search the capacities (Feasible Function).

Formulating the Predicate & Invariants

Turning intuition into a boolean rule

Invariant: every capacity before lo fails can_ship, and every capacity from hi on passes it, so the smallest passing capacity is between lo and hi. More capacity never needs more days, so the answers read False, then True.

Silent Failure Traps & Edge Cases

Where confident candidates still lose points

  • Leaving out the guard w > capacity: a ship smaller than one package is reported as working, so weights = [5], days = 2 returns 1 instead of 5.

  • Setting hi too low: with hi = max(weights), the running input returns 10 instead of 15, because every capacity below 15 fails.

  • Day counting: days_needed starts at 1, and the test is days_needed <= days. Starting at 0 counts a day too few, and == rejects a big ship that needs fewer days.

The 60-Second Interview Pitch

Say this out loud before you type a single line

"This is a Feasible Function search. The answer is a capacity, not an index, so I write the check can_ship as a simulation: fill each day until the next package would overflow, count the days, and return days_needed <= days. A package that is heavier than the ship makes the check return False. More capacity never needs more days, so the answers are False and then True, and I run Lower Bound over the capacities from 1 to sum(weights) + 1. The total weight always works, so it is a safe end of the range. The trap is leaving out the guard for a package that is heavier than the ship. That is O(N log S) time, with S the total weight, and O(1) space."

Big-O Invariant Derivation

Complexity & Mathematical Proof

TIME COMPLEXITY

O(N * log(sum(weights)))

Look at the structure: Lower Bound runs while lo < hi: over the capacities [1, sum(weights) + 1). Each pass halves the range, so it runs at most about log2(S) + 1 passes, with S = sum(weights). Each pass calls can_ship(mid), and that call runs one for w in weights: loop over all N packages in O(N) time. N work per pass times log S passes gives O(N log S) time.

SPACE COMPLEXITY

O(1)

Look at the memory used: both Lower Bound and the check are iterative, so the call stack holds a few frames. Inside can_ship we keep only two integers, days_needed and load. Auxiliary space is O(1).

Formal Recurrence Relation

T(N,S)=O(N)⋅O(log⁡S)=O(Nlog⁡S)T(N, S) = O(N) · O(\log S) = O(N \log S)T(N,S)=O(N)⋅O(logS)=O(NlogS)

Derivation Progression

Answer Space Bounding

Range = [1, ∑ W + 1)

The smallest capacity to try is 1, and the total weight always works, so the range is [1, sum(weights) + 1).

Linear Greedy Validator

O(N) linear scan

for w in weights: loop packs packages greedily into the current day in O(N) time.

Feasible Function search on the answer range

O(N · log(∑ W))

Lower Bound runs about log2(sum W) passes, and each pass runs the O(N) check once.

Variable Definitions

NNN

Total number of package items in array

SumSumSum

Total sum of all package weights in the array

MaxMaxMax

Maximum single package weight

Memory Architecture & Bounds

🟣 Call Stack

O(1) Iterative while loop with zero recursion frames

🔵 Auxiliary Heap

O(1) Only scalar accumulators in CPU registers

🟢 Output Space

O(1) Returns optimal minimum integer capacity

Boundary Best / Worst Cases

Best Case

O(Nlog⁡(∑W))O(N \log(∑ W))O(Nlog(∑W)) — Fixed number of binary search iterations.

Average Case

O(Nlog⁡(∑W))O(N \log(∑ W))O(Nlog(∑W)).

Worst Case

O(Nlog⁡(∑W))O(N \log(∑ W))O(Nlog(∑W)) — Standard binary search on integer domain.

Recurrence Tree Topology

Recurrence Tree Topology
Synthesizing vector architecture diagram...
Staff+ Engineering Perspective

Senior SWE Deconstruction & Hardware Caveats

ARCHITECTURAL SIGNALS & INTERVIEW TRIGGERS

The statement asks for "the smallest ship capacity that still gets every package shipped within days days." The answer is a number you choose, not an index, and checking one number means running the task with it. A bigger capacity never needs more days. This is a Feasible Function search: Lower Bound over the capacities, with a simulation as the check.

CONSTRAINTS & BOUNDS

With up to 5×1045 \times 10^45×104 packages of weight at most 500500500, sum(weights) is at most 2.5×1072.5 \times 10^72.5×107, so the range [1, sum(weights) + 1) needs only about log⁡2(2.5×107)≈25\log_2(2.5 \times 10^7) \approx 25log2​(2.5×107)≈25 checks of O(N)O(N)O(N) each. The guard w > capacity makes the check False for a capacity below the heaviest package, so the range can start at 1.

FAANG PRODUCTION TRAPS & EDGE CASES

Leaving out the guard w > capacity is the trap: a package that is heavier than the ship opens a new day and is still loaded, so a too-small capacity looks like it works. Two edge cases pin the answer: when days == len(weights), the answer is max(weights), and when days == 1, the ship must take sum(weights) at once. Both are inside the range, so the search returns them without a special case.

Theory Context•Binary Search Boundary
MediumLC 1011

Capacity To Ship Packages Within D Days (LC 1011)

Target Frequency:GoogleAmazonMeta

A conveyor belt lines up packages that must all ship out within days days. The i-th package weighs weights[i]; each day you load the ship with the next packages in belt order, but the total you load in a single day can never exceed the ship's weight capacity.

Find the smallest ship capacity that still gets every package shipped within days days.

Worked Examples

Example 1
Input:weights = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], days = 5
Output:15
Explanation: With capacity 15, the days can be 1+2+3+4+5 = 15, 6+7 = 13, 8, 9, 10: exactly 5 days. With capacity 14, the same rule needs 6 days, so 15 is the smallest capacity that works.
Example 2
Input:weights = [3,2,2,4,1,4], days = 3
Output:6
Explanation: Capacity 6 lets the belt ship in exactly 3 days: day 1 carries 3+2=5, day 2 carries 2+4=6, day 3 carries 1+4=5 -- each day stays within capacity 6.
Example 3
Input:weights = [1,2,3,1,1], days = 4
Output:3
Explanation: 1st day: 1 2nd day: 2 3rd day: 3 4th day: 1, 1

⚖️Formal Constraints & Bounds

  • 1 <= days <= weights.length <= 5 * 104

  • 1 <= weights[i] <= 500

Deep-Dive & Conceptual Insights

Core Insight

The answer is a number you choose, not an index. The check can_ship simulates the task for one capacity, and more capacity never needs more days, so the answers are False and then True and Lower Bound finds the first True.

Real-World Scenario & Production Applications

Autoscaling container clusters and shipping logistics: determining the minimum server capacity or cargo fleet size to handle traffic spikes within guaranteed SLA deadlines.

Subproblems & Recurrence Decomposition3 Phases

🧩Subproblem 1: The Check Is A Simulation

Write the check can_ship(capacity) first. One pass packs the packages in order: a package that is heavier than the ship makes the check False, a package that would overflow the day starts a new day, and the check returns days_needed <= days.

Mathematical Recurrence / Code Invariant
def can_ship(capacity):
    days_needed, load = 1, 0
    for w in weights:
        if w > capacity:
            return False
        if load + w > capacity:
            days_needed += 1
            load = 0
        load += w
    return days_needed <= days

Step-by-Step Execution Trace Table

StepRange [lo, hi)mid (capacity)The check can_ship(mid)DecisionNew range [lo, hi)
1[1, 9)5Day 1: 1 + 2 = 3. Package 3 would make 6, so day 2 starts: 3 + 1 + 1 = 5. Days needed: 2, and 2 <= 4 → Truemid may be the smallest: hi = mid[1, 5)
2[1, 5)3Day 1: 1 + 2 = 3. Package 3 would make 6, so day 2: 3. Package 1 would make 4, so day 3: 1 + 1 = 2. Days needed: 3, and 3 <= 4 → Truehi = mid[1, 3)
3[1, 3)2The package of weight 3 is larger than 2, so the guard w > capacity returns → Falseevery capacity up to 2 is too small: lo = mid + 1[3, 3)
4[3, 3)The range is empty. Lower Bound returns 3.

The trace for weights = [1, 2, 3, 1, 1] and days = 4, step by step:

  • The total weight is 8, so the candidates are the capacities 1 to 8. The range is [1, 9).
  • Step 1 tests capacity 5. The packages ship in 2 days, which is at most 4, so 5 works and we keep it with hi = mid.
  • Step 2 tests capacity 3. The packages ship in 3 days, so 3 works too, and we keep it.
  • Step 3 tests capacity 2. The package of weight 3 does not fit on a ship with capacity 2, so the check is False. Capacities 1 and 2 are too small, so lo = mid + 1 = 3.
  • Step 4: lo is equal to hi, so the answer is 3.
Code Shape
Archetype Code Shape
Python
1def can_ship(capacity: int) -> bool:
2 days_needed, load = 1, 0
3 for w in weights:
4 if w > capacity:
5 return False
6 if load + w > capacity:
7 days_needed += 1
8 load = 0
9 load += w
10 return days_needed <= days
11lo = 1
12hi = sum(weights) + 1
13return binary_search_lower_bound(lo, hi, can_ship)

Conceptual Narrative

🧭 Conceptual Foundation & Pattern Intuition

Some answers are not in the input. They are a number you choose: a capacity, a speed, a number of days. The only way to test a number is to run the task with it. So the check is a simulation, and Lower Bound searches the numbers themselves. For Capacity To Ship Packages Within D Days (LC 1011), the check asks: can the packages ship within days days with this capacity?

🚢 The Analogy: Choosing The Size Of A Ship

Imagine you must pick the smallest ship that carries all packages, in belt order, within a deadline. You cannot read the answer from a list. You can only try a ship size and count the days. If a ship of size 15 is enough, a ship of size 16 is enough too. So the sizes that fail come first, and the sizes that work come after them. The smallest size that works is the boundary.

🔑 Why It Works

The simulation answers the question exactly for one capacity. More capacity never needs more days, so the row of answers is False and then True, and Lower Bound finds the first True. The total weight always works, so it is a safe end of the range. The guard w > capacity matters: without it, a ship smaller than one package is reported as working.

  • Lower bound set below maximum single item: Setting lo = 0 or lo = 1 allows candidate capacities smaller than the heaviest package, which can never be shipped. Lower bound must strictly be max(weights).

  • Upper bound set too low: The worst-case upper bound is when all packages are shipped on a single day. hi must be initialized to sum(weights).

  • Off-by-one day counter in greedy feasibility check: Initializing days_needed = 0 instead of 1 underestimates the day count by 1. A new non-empty allocation always requires at least day 1.

Senior SWE Reasoning Architecture

4-Phase Thought Process Model

Pattern Recognition Signals

The 10-second spot

"Find the smallest ship capacity that still gets every package shipped within days days": the smallest value that passes a check, and a bigger capacity never needs more days, so binary search the capacities (Feasible Function).

Formulating the Predicate & Invariants

Turning intuition into a boolean rule

Invariant: every capacity before lo fails can_ship, and every capacity from hi on passes it, so the smallest passing capacity is between lo and hi. More capacity never needs more days, so the answers read False, then True.

Silent Failure Traps & Edge Cases

Where confident candidates still lose points

  • Leaving out the guard w > capacity: a ship smaller than one package is reported as working, so weights = [5], days = 2 returns 1 instead of 5.

  • Setting hi too low: with hi = max(weights), the running input returns 10 instead of 15, because every capacity below 15 fails.

  • Day counting: days_needed starts at 1, and the test is days_needed <= days. Starting at 0 counts a day too few, and == rejects a big ship that needs fewer days.

The 60-Second Interview Pitch

Say this out loud before you type a single line

"This is a Feasible Function search. The answer is a capacity, not an index, so I write the check can_ship as a simulation: fill each day until the next package would overflow, count the days, and return days_needed <= days. A package that is heavier than the ship makes the check return False. More capacity never needs more days, so the answers are False and then True, and I run Lower Bound over the capacities from 1 to sum(weights) + 1. The total weight always works, so it is a safe end of the range. The trap is leaving out the guard for a package that is heavier than the ship. That is O(N log S) time, with S the total weight, and O(1) space."

Big-O Invariant Derivation

Complexity & Mathematical Proof

TIME COMPLEXITY

O(N * log(sum(weights)))

Look at the structure: Lower Bound runs while lo < hi: over the capacities [1, sum(weights) + 1). Each pass halves the range, so it runs at most about log2(S) + 1 passes, with S = sum(weights). Each pass calls can_ship(mid), and that call runs one for w in weights: loop over all N packages in O(N) time. N work per pass times log S passes gives O(N log S) time.

SPACE COMPLEXITY

O(1)

Look at the memory used: both Lower Bound and the check are iterative, so the call stack holds a few frames. Inside can_ship we keep only two integers, days_needed and load. Auxiliary space is O(1).

Formal Recurrence Relation

T(N,S)=O(N)⋅O(log⁡S)=O(Nlog⁡S)T(N, S) = O(N) · O(\log S) = O(N \log S)T(N,S)=O(N)⋅O(logS)=O(NlogS)

Derivation Progression

Answer Space Bounding

Range = [1, ∑ W + 1)

The smallest capacity to try is 1, and the total weight always works, so the range is [1, sum(weights) + 1).

Linear Greedy Validator

O(N) linear scan

for w in weights: loop packs packages greedily into the current day in O(N) time.

Feasible Function search on the answer range

O(N · log(∑ W))

Lower Bound runs about log2(sum W) passes, and each pass runs the O(N) check once.

Variable Definitions

NNN

Total number of package items in array

SumSumSum

Total sum of all package weights in the array

MaxMaxMax

Maximum single package weight

Memory Architecture & Bounds

🟣 Call Stack

O(1) Iterative while loop with zero recursion frames

🔵 Auxiliary Heap

O(1) Only scalar accumulators in CPU registers

🟢 Output Space

O(1) Returns optimal minimum integer capacity

Boundary Best / Worst Cases

Best Case

O(Nlog⁡(∑W))O(N \log(∑ W))O(Nlog(∑W)) — Fixed number of binary search iterations.

Average Case

O(Nlog⁡(∑W))O(N \log(∑ W))O(Nlog(∑W)).

Worst Case

O(Nlog⁡(∑W))O(N \log(∑ W))O(Nlog(∑W)) — Standard binary search on integer domain.

Recurrence Tree Topology

Recurrence Tree Topology
Synthesizing vector architecture diagram...
Staff+ Engineering Perspective

Senior SWE Deconstruction & Hardware Caveats

ARCHITECTURAL SIGNALS & INTERVIEW TRIGGERS

The statement asks for "the smallest ship capacity that still gets every package shipped within days days." The answer is a number you choose, not an index, and checking one number means running the task with it. A bigger capacity never needs more days. This is a Feasible Function search: Lower Bound over the capacities, with a simulation as the check.

CONSTRAINTS & BOUNDS

With up to 5×1045 \times 10^45×104 packages of weight at most 500500500, sum(weights) is at most 2.5×1072.5 \times 10^72.5×107, so the range [1, sum(weights) + 1) needs only about log⁡2(2.5×107)≈25\log_2(2.5 \times 10^7) \approx 25log2​(2.5×107)≈25 checks of O(N)O(N)O(N) each. The guard w > capacity makes the check False for a capacity below the heaviest package, so the range can start at 1.

FAANG PRODUCTION TRAPS & EDGE CASES

Leaving out the guard w > capacity is the trap: a package that is heavier than the ship opens a new day and is still loaded, so a too-small capacity looks like it works. Two edge cases pin the answer: when days == len(weights), the answer is max(weights), and when days == 1, the ship must take sum(weights) at once. Both are inside the range, so the search returns them without a special case.

© 2026 Hi👋WebEnterprise. All rights reserved.
Sitemap•llms.txt•