Hi👋SpeedAlgo • Deliberate Practice & Cognitive Ergonomics for Software Engineers

An interactive algorithm mastery and technical interview preparation platform published by Hi👋WebEnterprise. Built for senior and staff software engineers preparing for rigorous coding screens at top tech companies (FAANG/MAMAA).

13 Core Algorithmic Patterns & 225 Practice Problems

  • 1. Two Pointers (16 Paradigms, 43 Problems): Opposite ends, sorted pair sums, palindrome verification, trapping rain water, 3Sum, container with most water — includes the Sliding Window and Fast & Slow Pointers paradigms (contiguous subarray invariants, longest substrings, Floyd's cycle detection, linked list middle).
  • 2. Binary Search (9 Paradigms, 14 Problems): Monotonic predicate partitioning (feasible(x)), boundary search, rotated sorted arrays, square roots, minimum ship capacity, median of two sorted arrays, matrix median on value range.
  • 3. Bit Manipulation (5 Paradigms, 11 Problems): Counting set bits, XOR cancellation, bit reversal, bitmask pairing, maximum XOR with a bitwise trie.
  • 4. Math & Geometry (8 Paradigms, 14 Problems): Sieve of Eratosthenes, integer/roman conversions, modular arithmetic, geometric simulation.
  • 5. Tree/Graph Depth-First Search (15 Paradigms, 24 Problems): Path sums, lowest common ancestor, tree diameter, validating BSTs, tree DP (House Robber III, Binary Tree Cameras).
  • 6. Tree/Graph Breadth-First Search (5 Paradigms, 12 Problems): Level-order traversals, shortest path in unweighted graphs, zig-zag traversals, rotting oranges, word ladders.
  • 7. Graphs (12 Paradigms, 22 Problems): Topological sort, cycle detection, Dijkstra's algorithm, bipartite graph validation, network delay.
  • 8. Backtracking (6 Paradigms, 14 Problems): Subsets, permutations, combinations, constraint satisfaction, pruning, N-Queens, Sudoku solver.
  • 9. Dynamic Programming (13 Paradigms, 28 Problems): Memoization vs tabulation, 0/1 knapsack, unbounded knapsack, coin change, edit distance, longest common subsequence.
  • 10. Heap / Priority Queue (9 Paradigms, 11 Problems): Running medians, top-k elements, interval scheduling, IPO, k-way merges.
  • 11. Advanced Data Structures (7 Paradigms, 17 Problems): Trie (prefix tree), Union-Find (Disjoint Set Union), LRU Cache, LFU Cache, range-sum queries with updates.
  • 12. Stack (5 Paradigms, 9 Problems): Next greater element, largest rectangle in histogram, remove k digits, decode string, min stack.
  • 13. Intervals & Greedy (2 Paradigms, 6 Problems): Merge intervals, interval scheduling, meeting rooms by sweep line, jump game.

4-Stage Deliberate Practice Framework

  1. Stage 1 (Compare & Learn): Read the pattern's mental model, loop invariant and Big-O proof, compare the pattern's template with the problem's solution side by side, and use the step-by-step debugger. The solution can also be shown in C#, Java, TypeScript, C++, Go or Rust for almost every problem.
  2. Stage 2 (Active Recall): Rebuild the solution from memory in a code editor, with an invariant checklist and optional progressive hints, and check it against a judged test suite.
  3. Stage 3 (AI Interview Coach, coming soon): A mock-interview stage still in development; for now, students go straight from Stage 2 to Stage 4.
  4. Stage 4 (Solve on Your Own): Solve a new problem on your own against a 15-minute timer; your code is graded against a test suite. Python and TypeScript run in your browser and C# runs on our server (design problems grade in Python and TypeScript).

Equipped with a spaced-repetition review hub on a fixed 7-step schedule (1 day up to 90 days), a two-pane Studio workspace, and study notes.

Pricing, Access & Commercial Terms

  • Core Curriculum: 100% Free. No credit card required.
  • Coins: New accounts get 40 free coins once, the daily claim adds +20 coins once a day, and inviting a friend earns you +25 coins when they complete their first practice step. These are the only ways to earn coins.
  • AI Coach: Each AI coach question costs 1-5 coins, priced by the server according to its size.
  • BYOK (Bring Your Own Key): AI coaching is free with your own Google Gemini, OpenAI or OpenRouter API key (BYOK).
  • Extras: Coins also unlock extras for 24 hours: a Recall hint level (1 coin), a Solve solution reveal (2), a LeetCode problem card's solutions (1) and a pattern's extra canonical problems (1).
  • Payments & Refunds: Nothing on the site is sold for money: coins can only be earned, never bought. There are no subscriptions or charges, so there is nothing to refund.
  • Platform Operator: Hi👋WebEnterprise. Support & policies at hispeedalgo.com.
Skip to main content
Hi👋SpeedAlgo

Invariant-First Algorithmic Mastery

Arena
238Items
Theory Context•Breadth-First Search (BFS)
EasyLC 111

Minimum Depth of Binary Tree (LeetCode 111)

Target Frequency:MetaAmazon

Given a binary tree, compute its minimum depth — the node count along the shortest root-to-leaf path.

Minimum depth means the fewest nodes you must pass through, starting at the root, to reach any leaf.

Note: a leaf has no children at all.

Worked Examples

Example 1
Input:root = [3,9,20,null,null,15,7]
Output:2
9315207
Explanation: The shortest root-to-leaf path is 3 -> 9, which has 2 nodes.
Example 2
Input:root = [2,null,3,null,4,null,5,null,6]
Output:5
Explanation: The tree is one chain 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> 6, so its only leaf is 5 nodes down.

⚖️Formal Constraints & Bounds

  • The number of nodes in the tree is in the range [0, 105].

  • -1000 <= Node.val <= 1000

Deep-Dive & Conceptual Insights

Core Insight

BFS level-by-level exploration guarantees that the first leaf encountered has minimal depth.

Real-World Scenario & Production Applications

Finding closest exit in navigation graphs, game-tree fastest win detection.

Subproblems & Recurrence Decomposition3 Phases

🧩Subproblem 1: Level Wavefront Root Seeding

Seed queue with (root, 1) representing the current node and its depth level. If not root, return 0 immediately.

Mathematical Recurrence / Code Invariant
if not root:
    return 0
queue = deque([(root, 1)])

Step-by-Step Execution Trace Table

Step-by-Step Wavefront Progression
  1. Step 1 (Root Seed, Depth 1, d=1): queue = [(3, 1)]. Push root with initial depth 1.
  2. Step 2 (Dequeue 3, Non-Leaf, d=1): Pop (3, 1). Node 3 has children 9 and 20 (not a leaf). Enqueue (9, 2) and (20, 2) →\rightarrow→ queue = [(9, 2), (20, 2)].
  3. Step 3 (Dequeue 9, Leaf Encountered, Early Exit, d=2): Pop (9, 2). Node 9 has left is None and right is None. First Leaf Hit: Immediately terminate BFS and return minimal depth 2 ✅.
Full Walkthrough3 Steps
Input:root = [3,9,20,null,null,15,7]Expected:2
1🌱 ROOT(Root Seed, Depth 1, d=1)
queue = [(3, 1)]
queue = [(3, 1)]. Push root with initial depth 1.
2🌊 ENQUEUE / DISCOVER(Dequeue 3, Non-Leaf, d=1)
queue = [(9, 2), (20, 2)]
Pop (3, 1). Node 3 has children 9 and 20 (not a leaf). Enqueue (9, 2) and (20, 2) →\rightarrow→ queue = [(9, 2), (20, 2)].
3⚡ FIFO DRAIN(Dequeue 9, Leaf Encountered, Early Exit, d=2)
Pop (9, 2). Node 9 has left is None and right is None. First Leaf Hit: Immediately terminate BFS and return minimal depth 2 ✅.
Code Shape
Archetype Code Shape
Python
1if not root:
2 return 0
3queue = deque([(root, 1)])
4while queue:
5 node, depth = queue.popleft()
6 if node is a leaf:
7 return depth
8 append the children of node to queue with depth + 1

Conceptual Narrative

🧭 Conceptual Foundation & Pattern Intuition

DFS can also find a tree's minimum depth — but it has to explore an entire skewed branch before it can be sure that branch isn't the shortest. BFS never has that problem.

🎯 The Analogy: A Search Party That Fans Out in Rings

Imagine a search party looking for the nearest exit from a maze, fanning outward in rings from the entrance — everyone one step away checks in before anyone two steps away even starts moving. The very first exit anyone reports back is guaranteed to be the closest one, because every exit at a smaller ring radius would have already been found and reported first. There's no need to keep searching once the first exit is found — every unexplored ring is, by definition, farther away.

🔑 The Key Idea in the Code

This early return is only safe because it's BFS, not DFS — a depth-first search could stumble onto a distant leaf down an early branch before ever checking a much closer leaf sitting on a different branch.

  • Single-child false leaf trap: A node with only one child is NOT a leaf. If a node has left = None and right = Node(2), returning 1 because left is None is wrong; min depth must reach a true leaf (left is None and right is None).

  • Skewed tree DFS inefficiency: Using DFS on a skewed tree explores all NNN nodes; BFS guarantees finding the minimum depth at first leaf discovery (O(min_depth)O(\text{min\_depth})O(min_depth) work).

  • Root level 0 vs 1 off-by-one: LeetCode defines single-node tree minimum depth as 1. Initializing depth = 0 and incrementing before leaf check ensures correct unit reporting.

Senior SWE Reasoning Architecture

4-Phase Thought Process Model

Pattern Recognition Signals

The 10-second spot

Shortest path to any leaf in a tree.

Formulating the Predicate & Invariants

Turning intuition into a boolean rule

Invariant: BFS explores by increasing depth; the first leaf dequeued is guaranteed to be at minimum depth.

Silent Failure Traps & Edge Cases

Where confident candidates still lose points

This problem's traps are in Common Pitfalls above.

The 60-Second Interview Pitch

Say this out loud before you type a single line

"I use BFS with a queue storing (node, depth) pairs. I pop nodes in arrival order; the first node with no left and no right child triggers an immediate return of its depth. Runs in O(N) time and O(W) space."

Big-O Invariant Derivation

Complexity & Mathematical Proof

TIME COMPLEXITY

O(N)

Look at the execution steps: BFS explores level by level and returns depth immediately upon encountering the first leaf node (node with no children).

SPACE COMPLEXITY

O(W) Auxiliary

Look at memory allocations: Call stack uses O(1) Iterative. Queue holds nodes at the current depth tier.

Formal Recurrence Relation

T(N) = O(K) ≤ O(N)

Derivation Progression

Level by Level Descent

depth += 1 per level

Tracks current tier distance from root.

First Leaf Detection

if not node.left and not node.right: return depth

Terminates immediately at shallowest leaf.

Time Bound

O(K) ≤ O(N)

Visits only nodes up to the first leaf level.

Variable Definitions

NNN

Total number of nodes in the binary tree

KKK

Number of nodes visited down to shallowest leaf

Memory Architecture & Bounds

🟣 Call Stack

O(1) Iterative

🔵 Auxiliary Heap

O(W) Queue up to min depth level width

🟢 Output Space

O(1) Depth integer

Boundary Best / Worst Cases

Best Case

O(1)O(1)O(1) if root is a leaf.

Average Case

O(K)≤O(N)O(K) ≤ O(N)O(K)≤O(N).

Worst Case

O(N)O(N)O(N) if all leaves are at the deepest level.

Graph & Tree Traversal Frontier

Graph & Tree Traversal Frontier
Synthesizing vector architecture diagram...
Staff+ Engineering Perspective

Senior SWE Deconstruction & Hardware Caveats

ARCHITECTURAL SIGNALS & INTERVIEW TRIGGERS

Triggers: "minimum depth of binary tree", "nearest leaf node". In contrast to DFS (which must traverse the full tree down to every leaf to find the minimum), BFS traverses level-by-level: The first leaf node encountered terminates the search immediately!

CONSTRAINTS & BOUNDS

N≤105N \le 10^5N≤105. Early exit terminates in O(K)O(K)O(K) where KKK is the number of nodes at depths ≤min_depth\le \text{min\_depth}≤min_depth.

FAANG PRODUCTION TRAPS & EDGE CASES

Empty root returns 0. Continuing search after discovering the first leaf: break immediately!

Theory Context•Breadth-First Search (BFS)
EasyLC 111

Minimum Depth of Binary Tree (LeetCode 111)

Target Frequency:MetaAmazon

Given a binary tree, compute its minimum depth — the node count along the shortest root-to-leaf path.

Minimum depth means the fewest nodes you must pass through, starting at the root, to reach any leaf.

Note: a leaf has no children at all.

Worked Examples

Example 1
Input:root = [3,9,20,null,null,15,7]
Output:2
9315207
Explanation: The shortest root-to-leaf path is 3 -> 9, which has 2 nodes.
Example 2
Input:root = [2,null,3,null,4,null,5,null,6]
Output:5
Explanation: The tree is one chain 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> 6, so its only leaf is 5 nodes down.

⚖️Formal Constraints & Bounds

  • The number of nodes in the tree is in the range [0, 105].

  • -1000 <= Node.val <= 1000

Deep-Dive & Conceptual Insights

Core Insight

BFS level-by-level exploration guarantees that the first leaf encountered has minimal depth.

Real-World Scenario & Production Applications

Finding closest exit in navigation graphs, game-tree fastest win detection.

Subproblems & Recurrence Decomposition3 Phases

🧩Subproblem 1: Level Wavefront Root Seeding

Seed queue with (root, 1) representing the current node and its depth level. If not root, return 0 immediately.

Mathematical Recurrence / Code Invariant
if not root:
    return 0
queue = deque([(root, 1)])

Step-by-Step Execution Trace Table

Step-by-Step Wavefront Progression
  1. Step 1 (Root Seed, Depth 1, d=1): queue = [(3, 1)]. Push root with initial depth 1.
  2. Step 2 (Dequeue 3, Non-Leaf, d=1): Pop (3, 1). Node 3 has children 9 and 20 (not a leaf). Enqueue (9, 2) and (20, 2) →\rightarrow→ queue = [(9, 2), (20, 2)].
  3. Step 3 (Dequeue 9, Leaf Encountered, Early Exit, d=2): Pop (9, 2). Node 9 has left is None and right is None. First Leaf Hit: Immediately terminate BFS and return minimal depth 2 ✅.
Full Walkthrough3 Steps
Input:root = [3,9,20,null,null,15,7]Expected:2
1🌱 ROOT(Root Seed, Depth 1, d=1)
queue = [(3, 1)]
queue = [(3, 1)]. Push root with initial depth 1.
2🌊 ENQUEUE / DISCOVER(Dequeue 3, Non-Leaf, d=1)
queue = [(9, 2), (20, 2)]
Pop (3, 1). Node 3 has children 9 and 20 (not a leaf). Enqueue (9, 2) and (20, 2) →\rightarrow→ queue = [(9, 2), (20, 2)].
3⚡ FIFO DRAIN(Dequeue 9, Leaf Encountered, Early Exit, d=2)
Pop (9, 2). Node 9 has left is None and right is None. First Leaf Hit: Immediately terminate BFS and return minimal depth 2 ✅.
Code Shape
Archetype Code Shape
Python
1if not root:
2 return 0
3queue = deque([(root, 1)])
4while queue:
5 node, depth = queue.popleft()
6 if node is a leaf:
7 return depth
8 append the children of node to queue with depth + 1

Conceptual Narrative

🧭 Conceptual Foundation & Pattern Intuition

DFS can also find a tree's minimum depth — but it has to explore an entire skewed branch before it can be sure that branch isn't the shortest. BFS never has that problem.

🎯 The Analogy: A Search Party That Fans Out in Rings

Imagine a search party looking for the nearest exit from a maze, fanning outward in rings from the entrance — everyone one step away checks in before anyone two steps away even starts moving. The very first exit anyone reports back is guaranteed to be the closest one, because every exit at a smaller ring radius would have already been found and reported first. There's no need to keep searching once the first exit is found — every unexplored ring is, by definition, farther away.

🔑 The Key Idea in the Code

This early return is only safe because it's BFS, not DFS — a depth-first search could stumble onto a distant leaf down an early branch before ever checking a much closer leaf sitting on a different branch.

  • Single-child false leaf trap: A node with only one child is NOT a leaf. If a node has left = None and right = Node(2), returning 1 because left is None is wrong; min depth must reach a true leaf (left is None and right is None).

  • Skewed tree DFS inefficiency: Using DFS on a skewed tree explores all NNN nodes; BFS guarantees finding the minimum depth at first leaf discovery (O(min_depth)O(\text{min\_depth})O(min_depth) work).

  • Root level 0 vs 1 off-by-one: LeetCode defines single-node tree minimum depth as 1. Initializing depth = 0 and incrementing before leaf check ensures correct unit reporting.

Senior SWE Reasoning Architecture

4-Phase Thought Process Model

Pattern Recognition Signals

The 10-second spot

Shortest path to any leaf in a tree.

Formulating the Predicate & Invariants

Turning intuition into a boolean rule

Invariant: BFS explores by increasing depth; the first leaf dequeued is guaranteed to be at minimum depth.

Silent Failure Traps & Edge Cases

Where confident candidates still lose points

This problem's traps are in Common Pitfalls above.

The 60-Second Interview Pitch

Say this out loud before you type a single line

"I use BFS with a queue storing (node, depth) pairs. I pop nodes in arrival order; the first node with no left and no right child triggers an immediate return of its depth. Runs in O(N) time and O(W) space."

Big-O Invariant Derivation

Complexity & Mathematical Proof

TIME COMPLEXITY

O(N)

Look at the execution steps: BFS explores level by level and returns depth immediately upon encountering the first leaf node (node with no children).

SPACE COMPLEXITY

O(W) Auxiliary

Look at memory allocations: Call stack uses O(1) Iterative. Queue holds nodes at the current depth tier.

Formal Recurrence Relation

T(N) = O(K) ≤ O(N)

Derivation Progression

Level by Level Descent

depth += 1 per level

Tracks current tier distance from root.

First Leaf Detection

if not node.left and not node.right: return depth

Terminates immediately at shallowest leaf.

Time Bound

O(K) ≤ O(N)

Visits only nodes up to the first leaf level.

Variable Definitions

NNN

Total number of nodes in the binary tree

KKK

Number of nodes visited down to shallowest leaf

Memory Architecture & Bounds

🟣 Call Stack

O(1) Iterative

🔵 Auxiliary Heap

O(W) Queue up to min depth level width

🟢 Output Space

O(1) Depth integer

Boundary Best / Worst Cases

Best Case

O(1)O(1)O(1) if root is a leaf.

Average Case

O(K)≤O(N)O(K) ≤ O(N)O(K)≤O(N).

Worst Case

O(N)O(N)O(N) if all leaves are at the deepest level.

Graph & Tree Traversal Frontier

Graph & Tree Traversal Frontier
Synthesizing vector architecture diagram...
Staff+ Engineering Perspective

Senior SWE Deconstruction & Hardware Caveats

ARCHITECTURAL SIGNALS & INTERVIEW TRIGGERS

Triggers: "minimum depth of binary tree", "nearest leaf node". In contrast to DFS (which must traverse the full tree down to every leaf to find the minimum), BFS traverses level-by-level: The first leaf node encountered terminates the search immediately!

CONSTRAINTS & BOUNDS

N≤105N \le 10^5N≤105. Early exit terminates in O(K)O(K)O(K) where KKK is the number of nodes at depths ≤min_depth\le \text{min\_depth}≤min_depth.

FAANG PRODUCTION TRAPS & EDGE CASES

Empty root returns 0. Continuing search after discovering the first leaf: break immediately!

© 2026 Hi👋WebEnterprise. All rights reserved.
Sitemap•llms.txt•